Recently I have heard the term "data-safe" from a number of sources and companies with regard to residual data security. It started me reminiscing about the first time I heard the term used. Now; I am not claiming to be the first to use it or to have invented it in this context however it is a term I have promoted.
I first heard the term in about 1995 when the then Operations Manager at TAM used it in a meeting. Derek Wood was ex-military. He made a really important point. The control of data was similar to the control of munitions in the Army and with the business equivalent of a huge explosion should it ever go wrong.
The military use terms such as "make safe" and they confirm a device is safe habitually before it is passed from one person to another. This chain of custody is also used in the control of data. The metaphor is a strong one and this is perhaps why the term has spread and stuck.
The explosive consequences of a data loss or data breach are huge but well publicised not least of which on this blog. It could be considered an explosion. A damaged brand, a compromised database, a million customers to notify all would be explosions in the world of most CTO's.
Would we carelessly discard an explosive device? They have a habit of sitting undiscovered for years at a time waiting to be made-safe or possibly to explode, the only difference being luck. Perhaps we should treat all data with the same consideration of consequences that the army use for munitions. Or await a big bang.
No comments:
Post a Comment